Overview of the Panel Papers

Using an approach known as the Zurich–Danish model of consensus conferences, an independent, unbiased 12-person jury finalized recommendations prepared by nine panels of experts.

Grid containing content elements

Panel 6

Panel 7

Panel 1

Panel 2

Panel 8

Panel 3

Panel 4

Panel 9

Panel 5

Weiterführende Informationen

Comment and Jury recommendations

Bereichs-Navigation

Unterseiten von Panel Papers

Panel 1
Panel 2
Panel 3
Panel 4
Panel 5
Panel 6
Panel 7
Panel 8
Panel 9

Panel 1
Panel 2
Panel 3
Panel 4
Panel 5
Panel 6
Panel 7
Panel 8
Panel 9

chair4medicine

Quicklinks und Sprachwechsel

Main navigation

Overview of the Panel Papers

Grid containing content elements

How should Leadership, Management and Organizational Skills of Candidates be Assessed?

How should Personal and Social Skills be Assessed?

How to Attract the Best Candidates?

How should the Degrees, the Training Courses, the Professional and the Clinical Experience be Assessed; and how should the Honors, Awards, and Grants of the Candidates be Assessed?

Do we need an Algorithm or an Electronic Tool to Enhance the Selection Process of Academic Medical Chairs?

How should Demographics and the Language Skills of the Candidates be Assessed?

How Should the Scientometrics of the Chair Candidates be Assessed?

How should Post Recruitment Evaluation and Guidance be Defined?

How should the Educational Abilities of Candidates for Department Chair be Assessed?

Weiterführende Informationen

Nature Publications

Bereichs-Navigation

Unterseiten von Panel Papers